The assignment that got me re-writing was this (as best I can recover it from my notes):
Assignment. Something you know a lot about and write to show others. Scene, dialogue, feelings, narrative.That's approximate, but close. But that and reading the original piece to a friend got me thinking that I needed more of an explanation of the steering system and led to all the detail in the second version.
Along the way, I looked at the alternate writing assignment:
What do you feel strongly about? What experiences lead you to that. Be specific.I realized that I could be doing both assignments, although "strongly" may be an exaggeration. I'd already decided to drop the frame and I was trying to find a quotation to start. I didn't find the one I was looking for but I did find the one from Confucius that seemed on the money. In
fact, it made the old title work even better.
But, when all is said and done, I think the new version is inferior to the old version: too much explanation, really -- enough to stall the narrative. And it wouldn't have been there without the assignment.
That's often the problem with workshops and classes: they produce work that fills an assignment but that are not worth being published.